decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Neither Switzerland nor Mexico are good proxies for US gun laws | 483 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Gun bans work to disarm the law abiding. Period.
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 23 2012 @ 09:38 AM EST
There were no "other factors" in those results. We have just as many
idiots today as we had two
decades ago, in fact it seems that there are more. They just can't get a hold of
semi-automatic
weapons any more. There's no magic at play here.

Guns aren't totally outlawed here. The semi-automatic weapons that are so
favoured by mass
murders for their ability to kill so rapidly are. Belong to a shooting club,
have the weapon
registered, receive the appropriate training, and store it safely and you can
have one. You just
can't walk into our equivalent of Walmart and buy one along with the washing
detergent and a
DVD burner.

Some countries do have lots of guns without the US homicide rate. Now we are
getting into the
psyche of different people in different countries. Let's not go there.

I am sure that when writing your constitution, your founding fathers primary aim
was not to
protect the right of every lunatic to massacre school children. In fact, I dare
say they would be
horrified to know that what they intended as something that would be a benefit
to society was
being used to allow such atrocities to continue. Anyway constitutions can be
changed. The
right to bear arms is an "amendment" after all.

Does the constitution decree that the right cannot be regulated?
"Arms" are not just guns. Does
every US citizen have a constitutional right to own a thermonuclear device, or
does the
government already place some limits on what arms its citizens can and cannot
have?

Einstein said "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking
we used when we
created them." If you guys want to stop the massacres, you have to change,
which brings me
back to my original question - Do you have the intestinal fortitude to do what
needs to be
done?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Neither Switzerland nor Mexico are good proxies for US gun laws
Authored by: Charles888 on Sunday, December 23 2012 @ 10:18 AM EST
Switzerland does it very
differently. These guns are
regulated by the government and
their use is very tightly
controlled. So is the training. Do
you want the same? You can't pick
and choose.

As for Mexico, they can thank the
lose availability of military style
weaponry in the US (coupled with a
big market for illicit drugs) for
the gum violence they are having.
These guns do not come from Mexico.
Three come from the US.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )