decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Commission sends Statement of Objections to Samsung on potential misuse of mobile phone standard | 483 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Commission sends Statement of Objections to Samsung on potential misuse of mobile phone standard
Authored by: nsomos on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 01:48 PM EST
Press release ...

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1448_en.htm
----------------
The European Commission has informed Samsung of its preliminary view that
Samsung's seeking of injunctions against Apple in various Member States on the
basis of its mobile phone standard-essential patents ("SEPs") amounts
to an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by EU antitrust rules. While
recourse to injunctions is a possible remedy for patent infringements, such
conduct may be abusive where SEPs are concerned and the potential licensee is
willing to negotiate a licence on Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory
(so-called "FRAND") terms. The sending of a Statement of Objections
does not prejudge the final outcome of the investigation.
----------------

So tell me ... IS Apple willing to negotiate a 'licence'?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

in the 'so how can they possibly defend themselves agasint apple?' department ...
Authored by: RichardB on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 03:25 PM EST
Since Apple is litigating against Samsung, why doesn't that make Apple afoul of these competition rules?
Several of the players in the mobile space (Microsoft, Apple, Motorola) are under investigation. I wouldn't read too much into the fact that Samsung were the first to have formal charges put to them. It might even be good news for Samsung - reel in the smaller fish first. Pure speculation on my part, of course.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )