decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Calling for help | 483 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Facts only please
Authored by: Charles888 on Sunday, December 23 2012 @ 02:52 PM EST
1) This is exactly what I meant -
an order of magnitude higher than a
comparable western society, which is
the best proxy for the setup in the
US.

2) My memory is reading 3 tunes, but
if you say 4.5 tunes, I buy it -
same neighborhood. I wrote my
comment drawing on memory.
In another post a referenced
Australia's ~18 year experience
before and after, and then read that
it was 18 mass shouting in 16 years
before, and none in the 16 years
since. Sure, i was off by 2 years,
but it does not change the
conclusion.

3) How a person commits suicide is
ABSOLUTELY relevant to gun
possession. If we are talking about
public policy, these numbers matter.
If you can draw a straight line
between owning guns and committing
suicide (absent other factors), that
means that owning guns on itself are
negative factors to public
health/safety.

4) What is so incredulous about it?
How often is anybody attacked at
home and successfully uses a gun to
defend themselves? vs. those who
accidentally (or lose it in an
argument) shoot a family member.

As to the ton of people that you
know, neither you more I know enough
people to draw any statistically
significant conclusion. We only
have macro data to use for drawing
conclusions.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Calling for help
Authored by: jjs on Sunday, December 23 2012 @ 03:54 PM EST
"3) How a person commits suicide is really irrelevant to gun possession.
What difference does it make if they do it with a gun, a knife, a razor, drug
combinations, or other means?"

It matters greatly. Many who attempt suicide are calling for help. Many of the
other forms of suicide (especially drugs) take time, and give the person a
chance of successfully calling for help. Gun suicides don't have that option.


---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Facts only please
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 26 2012 @ 04:18 PM EST
not what i learned about magnitude... refer to the richter scale, star
brightness or loudness. it depends what you're measuring.

i thought better of you.

my own personal thoughts are that people with guns should be tested regularly
for competence.

j

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )