decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why the heck should the state pay pros for something hunters want to do? | 398 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Was the danger you were in to do with killing animals for sport?
Authored by: TerryC on Wednesday, December 26 2012 @ 03:29 AM EST
Yes.

I'd be interested to learn how often the inhabitants of Arizona get charged by a
herd of pig-sized animals when going about their daily business.

This reminds me of something I read somewhere about what the Victorians said
about the African Lion; 'This animal is dangerous, it defends itself when
attacked'.

---

Terry

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Why the heck should the state pay pros for something hunters want to do?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 26 2012 @ 01:22 PM EST
That is, selling javelina tags to hunters, who are sometimes successful, seems
to be sufficient to keep the population at a reasonable level. Why pay for
professional marksmen? Sounds like welfare by another name to me.

P.S. Come to VA and take a few deer off our roads...bullets are cheaper than
vehicle repairs!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Was the danger you were in to do with killing animals for sport?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 10:03 PM EST
Hello, Ian. Thank you for your reply. I appreciate your comments.

I was not hunting for sport, meat, or trophies when I was attacked by the
javelina. I was checking on my wildlife feeders and water stations (one of my
chosen methods of helping the wildlife that inhabit my rural area).

I (wisely, I think) arm myself on my "patrols", as one never knows
when one might encounter a species that is aggressive. I've had to kill
numerous predators, venomous snakes, rabid raccoons and skunks, and so forth.

I do not actively pursue predators except to eliminate personal threats, as I
prefer wildlife to maintain a healthy balance.

Where I live, it unwise to walk around without some sort of firearm ready to
hand. If one encounters a small threat, a .22 pistol might be sufficient. A
larger threat might require a large calibre pistol or a shotgun. A javelina
charge warrants an "assault" rifle. Granddad always said, "Pick
the right tool for the job."

Best regards!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )