decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Comes transcripts here, please | 398 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Comes 7270-->2004 BG email: cross group cooperation
Authored by: foulis on Sunday, December 23 2012 @ 08:18 PM EST
<b>From:</b> Jonathan Usher</br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 01, 2004 3:26 PM</br>
<b>To:</b> Digital Media Maui Marketing</br>
<b>Subject:</b> FW: Cross group cooperation – two exciting examples:
Maui Media and Spam</p>
Super to see this... well done everyone on the work thus far</p>
--------------------------------</p>
<b>From:</b> Bill Gates</br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thu 4/1/2004 7:31 AM</br>
<b>To:</b> Senior Leadership Team</br>
<b>Cc:</b> Jon DeVaan; Alexander Gounares; Eric Rudder; Steven
Sinofsky; Will Poole; Robert (Robbie) Bach; Doug Burgum; Pieter Knook; David
Cole; Hank Vigil; David Sobeski; Ryan Hamlin; Amir Majidimehr; Todd Warren;
Blake Irving; Will Kennedy</br>
<b>Subject:</b> Cross group cooperation – two exciting examples:
Maui Media and Spam</p>
We talk a lot about the difficulty of cross-group cooperation because it is so
important to our success in providing integrated innovation.<p/>
Two efforts I have reviewed recently impressed me with the strong cooperation
across multiple groups<p/>
Maui Media is the fall launch of a number of Media Center, Portable Media
Center, Windows Media 10, MSN Music, and a chance to show our DRM
progress.<p/>
It involves MSN, MED, and Windows in complex ways. For example talking to media
companies about what technologies to use and whether to license to
us.<p/>
Customers will see we have thought through the scenarios end-end. Apple still
has simpler UI for many tasks and we still have to craft the message so our
innovation shows through so we still have work to do.<p/>
However, the willingness of the groups to work together and to trust each other
has been a real asset.</p>
Likewise the SPAM effort involves a number of groups. Office, MSN,
MSR,Windows</p>
There are many aspects to it – legal, caller-id, IP address reputation, content
filtering and proof.</p>
We have to work with many other industry participants.</p>
We have already done leadership things on filtering which unfortunately isn't
enough.</p>
We have a roadmap for rolling out the other aspects including the coordination
of the various groups</p>
Like Maui Media a lot of the important work is still ahead of us including
getting credit for our innovation.</p>
However the willingness of the groups to work together and trust each other has
been a real asset.</p>
Personally I am not sure what the lessons learned here are but we should look
into both to make sure we reward and identify the key elements.</p>
We identified the problem set/scenario we are going after. It was a priority
effort of the various groups.</p>
12/7/2004<br>
<p align=center><b>Plaintiff's
Exhibit<br><u>7270</u></b><br>Comes V.
Microsoft</p>
<p align=right>MS-CC-RN 000000256561<br>HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL</p>
<hr>
<br>
The groups decided they needed to work with each other. I am sure the attitudes
of the key people has been critical.</p>
<br>
<br>
12/7/2004<br>
<p align=right>MS-CC-RN 000000256562<br>HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL</p>

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Comes transcripts here, please
Authored by: PJ on Monday, December 24 2012 @ 01:50 AM EST
You are welcome. Please help. The
thought of doing another one right after
this 300+ page one is awful.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )