decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
New kids' online privacy rules give pass to Apple, Google, Facebook | 222 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple thinks this means they need additional half billion dollars in damages
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 19 2012 @ 07:13 PM EST
link

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Time Names Mitt Romney Man of the Year 1912
Authored by: albert on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 12:42 PM EST
Link
I like this guy Borowitz...
OK, way off topic... so sue me....wait...need a good laff now and then...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

EU’s tougher Google deal derails FTC
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 02:05 PM EST
What's this story about? The only significant difference I see between the FTC and EU cases is the original dates for settlement. Now the FTC seems to have got wind of of different treatment in Europe it is delaying its announcement in case it needs tweaking. The Newspick runs all round this without saying anything substantial about the difference in Google's treatment at the two forums, other than putting "voluntary" in quotes for the EU part. I found another story that said the EU merely
expect Google to come forward with a detailed commitment text in January 2013.
...
The investigation centres on four areas:
  • the manner in which Google displays "its own vertical search services differently" from other, competing products
  • how Google "copies content" from other websites - such as restaurant reviews - to include within its own services
  • the "exclusivity" Google has to sell advertising around search terms people use
  • restrictions on advertisers from moving their online ad campaigns to rival search engines
BBC

Of course it's technically feasible for Google to withdraw from the EU, close its offices there, accept no queries, offer no search results for EU entities. This would probably result in backlash from users outside the EU looking for results inside, at least as great as the ire of previous EU users. 'Bout time all these banana republics, yes EU and US, realised the internet is bigger than all of them. Even the ITU can't control it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

New kids' online privacy rules give pass to Apple, Google, Facebook
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 03:16 PM EST

Article link.

Ya Know - if that Law has teeth and holds the software development companies properly accountable that presents an interesting "hack" for those of us who wish to maintain our privacy better:

    When we get an account created, we create our own account as a child!
Granted, that makes it a bit more difficult if we wish to do on-line shopping. But there's no reason you can't have two accounts:
    Adult account with credit card access and almost non-existent information!
    Child account for all our regular browsing!
That's assuming the software developers will be properly held accountable when they breach the privacy rules surrounding children.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )