decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
My only question | 302 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
My only question
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 04:33 PM EST
Is M$ being taxed the same way?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Google India fined $13.8M for false accounting
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 06:59 PM EST
The biggest problem with international companies is that they actively evade
their tax obligations placing a greater burden on ordinary citizens. In my view
it's unethical, immoral and should not be allowed.

Multinationals use transfer pricing and distribution fees, being just two of the
mechanisms, to shift money to a foreign affiliate located in a lower (or no tax)
jurisdiction. It's not uncommon for companies making billions in one
jurisdiction to play little or no tax using such mechanisms. So it's time that
multinationals paid their dues just like the rest of us.

But for India to avoid any perception of bias against any one multinational,
best to go after all multinationals since they all practice the same mechanisms
to avoid their tax obligations.

Really it's time the tax system was overhauled to remove the requirement for an
army of accountants just to administer the books. I prefer a simple very low tax
on turnover (without deductables) as this could generate an equitable tax take
without the huge wiggle room that such complex systems allow. Sell some widget
or service for $100, pay $1 tax regardless of the cost of selling the widget or
providing the service. A child could administer such a tax system. But where
would all the multinationals go???

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )