|
|
|
| Authored by: imperial on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 10:00 AM EST |
Wait till you read the order denying Samsung a new trial. The old Judge Koh is
still there and still overtly hostile to Samsung. She goes through a whole
series of contortions to try and justify examining the conduct of Velvin Hogan
and the only thing that is transparent about that is Koh's avoidance of her
responsibility to provide a fair and unbiased trial.
I personally do not think she belongs on a District Court bench. Others may have
a different view.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 01:01 PM EST |
The foreman ignored the instructions. I see no evidence the instructions were
careless and I don't see why more careful instructions wouldn't have been
similarly ignored.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 06:59 PM EST |
Not as much care as you'd think.
There's clear evidence of Misconduct- not declaring it can render the verdict,
etc. as appealable. Most Judges handling a case with care wouldn't DO that.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 19 2012 @ 02:48 AM EST |
And she has now shrugged and said "Well, OK, not a problem".
The next jury she instructs might as well bring a deck of cards to keep
themselves amused while she's saying all that boring, like, you know, and
whatever stuff.
Silly, silly judge. Don't say it unless you *mean* it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
