Imagine if Samsung had, in the middle of the trial, alerted Judge Koh that a possible conflict existed in the empaneling of Velvin Hogan.

Excerpt of imagined transcript from the "but-for world":

MR. QUINN: Your honor, we have found a problem with one of the jurors. May I approach the bench?

THE COURT: Don't make me sanction you, Mr. Quinn. Please.

That's a road you don't have to walk down to see the "Dead End" sign.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• To follow up on your point... - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 03:17 PM EST

I'm far more interested in seeing how his behavior plays out with the Appeal's Court(s).

Specifically:

His behavior around "instructing" the other members of the Jury in how to handle prior art and such.

However, in my non-legal mind, it's something altogether different to provide interpretations that either:

A) were not covered at all in the Jury instructions

B) were opposite to what was covered in the Jury instructsions.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• The Past is Prologue - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 11:37 PM EST
  • Semi-agreed - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 19 2012 @ 12:20 PM EST
    • A combination of the two - Authored by: jbb on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 01:24 AM EST