decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Bring more guns to schools?! | 302 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Bring more guns to schools?!
Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, December 19 2012 @ 03:18 PM EST
{
My point was that the goal was to have armed citizenry. It was left unsaid, that
the citizenry would then be trained as a
militia. My point was that the state wouldn't have to pay for the guns and
ammo.
}

As I said an untrained armed citizenry is not a militia. It is a danger to
everyone, as recent and other events have repeatedly shown.

{
Not sure what disaster you're referring to about the 1812 War. But As near as I
can tell it worked as well as it could have. Considering, we were attacked by
the most powerful nation on Earth and we had no standing army or navy, and still
managed to win in the end.
}

Outside of the Royal Navy raiding U.S. ships for English born crew, the first
attack was done by the U.S. into Canada. Overall the war was a draw, with much
incompetence on both sides. A big problem for the U.S. was the militia training
often considered of little more than meeting at the pub. Then there was the
problem at Queenston Heights, where many of the militia flat out refused to
cross the river. There was also incompetent command, among other problems. It
was only later in the was that the U.S. military gain much competence, but by
then, the war was pretty much over. Also, one of the goals of that war was to
take over what is now Canada. I don't recall that happening.




---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Revising 1812 History?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 19 2012 @ 03:26 PM EST
You seem to have your history a little mixed up.
Not sure what disaster you're referring to about the 1812 War. But As near as I can tell it worked as well as it could have. Considering, we were attacked by the most powerful nation on Earth and we had no standing army or navy, and still managed to win in the end.
I do not think the USA was the most powerful nation on Earth in 1812. They badly underestimated the strength of the local forces (British, French and Native) and were defeated.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )