I'm sorry,but your comments don't make any legal
sense. Here's an article
you might like to read,
which states that even the judge's willfulness
damages,
let along the jury's misguided effort to give
more in damages (see verdict form)
than the law allows (see jury instructions), very probably won't survive appeal,
even if she were
to order them:
Additionally, due to the lack of
detail in the jury verdict regarding which Samsung products were used to commit
willful infringement, it is quite possible that no enhancement of damages for
willful infringement will survive an appeal. The judge is the only
one who can triple the damages for willfulness. If you were on the jury, you'd
know that, because the judge told the jury that. So give it a rest, will
you? I can't let Groklaw be used for empty opinions not based on reality. I'm
too busy. If you don't have enough to keep you busy, how about doing a text
version of one of the Comes v. Microsoft exhibits? That'd be more positive. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|