decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Corrections Thread Here... | 35 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
should /NOT/ preserve e-mails? ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 19 2012 @ 10:37 PM EST
Either this is a mistake in the transcrypt, or my English failed.
But if they tell their employees to keep their emails _below_ a number, then
that is telling them to delete mails, not to save them, right?

"MS. ESTRICH: Their own declaration in this case said they had a policy in
place to remind custodians and employees on a regular basis that they should
keep the number of e-mails in their files below a certain number.

THE COURT: Is that the same thing as leaving on an auto delete
functionality?"
...
"THE COURT: Okay. I want to make sure I'm following Samsung's position
here. Let's be clear. You are saying that maintaining a system of automatic
destruction is no different, conceptually or otherwise, from affirmatively
instructing people, reminding them that they should preserve e-mails?"


MBB

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Corrections Thread Here...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 25 2012 @ 09:29 AM EST
When I was originally asked to join the board, I had some stonrg reservations
about it for many reasons, but decided to give it a try for the purpose of
helping out the community in a constructive way. For instance, I'd heard about a
previous editorial board for the Linux Journal who all resigned at the same
time, I think not compensating people who contribute to the magazine is
completely unethical, and their website reminds me of a warez site where
popups, videos, and all kinds of other annoying crap invade your computer.
Despite all of that, I assumed that being part of an editorial board would help
voice developers concerns like Your site makes the baby Jesus cry, make it
stop! , What kind of monkeys are editing the articles? , and Why do you keep
stealing people's content and publishing it as your own? .

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )