Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Posner For The Win | 148 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Posner For The Win/Koh is biased

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 17 2012 @ 02:54 PM EST

When I read the discussion about the exhibits, it appears like Judge Koh has
already decided about the matter and it seems like the only reason for having
the discussion is to get having it on record, and not about any desire to
maintain an open mind.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Posner For The Win/Koh is biased - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 17 2012 @ 03:04 PM EST
- "What's the point?" - Authored by: stegu on Monday, December 17 2012 @ 07:41 PM EST
Posner For The Win/Koh is biased - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 25 2012 @ 08:14 AM EST

Posner For The Win

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 31 2012 @ 01:55 AM EST

Implicit in ISO flippant rensspoe to these countries' MS-OOXML appeals is the
feeling that many people around the world wasted two years of their life to
filtering through the morass the Microsoft plopped on the table. The next time
you have to ask yourself, who will be willing to take the time better, who HAS
the time! to submit to another corporate, proprietary standard being rushed
through over any and all objections?And let's be frank: if MS-OOXML can be
approved, I'd like to see what will be rejected in the future. Sorta feels like
you're watching an NBA game where the officials have already placed their bets!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )