decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
LA Times: Court rejects Apple's bid to ban Samsung items | 148 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
LA Times: Court rejects Apple's bid to ban Samsung items
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 02:12 AM EST
The LA Times reports the same:

Court rejects Apple's bid to ban Samsung items

Los Angeles Times | December 17, 2012 | 9:22 PM

A federal judge on Monday denied Apple Inc.'s request for a permanent ban on 26 Samsung products that a jury had found infringed on Apple patents for the iPhone and the iPad.

But U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh also rejected Samsung's motion for a new trial based on jury misconduct.

For the latest information go to www.latimes.com.

---
T he Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Clickable URL - Apple's injunction request denied/Samsung Jury tampering claim denied
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 02:16 AM EST
Clickable: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/18/us-apple-samsung-idUSBRE8BH06620121218

---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple's injunction request denied/Samsung Jury tampering claim denied
Authored by: kg on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 02:16 AM EST
Is jury tampering the right term?

Also, this ruling is hardly surprising, given that she said in the
hearing she had hoped to send them on their merry way to
appeals.

As for her recognition that only a very small subset of features
are infringing, that argument could be used in many instances.
Including copyright infringement, plagiarism, etc. Not that they
will ever go there, but it demonstrates the absurdity of modern
IP law.

---
IANAL
Linguist and Open Source Developer

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple's injunction request denied/Samsung Jury tampering claim denied
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 03:32 AM EST
Judge Koh to future Jurors:

"Go ahead and taint justice any which way you feel like it! Behave as an
expert witness, even if - no, no, ESPECIALLY if you have no clue as to what the
proper law, or facts are. Bonus 'expert' points if you stay at a Holiday Inn
Express, folks!"

Please excuse me, I need to go be sick now.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )