Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 02:12 AM EST |
The LA Times reports the same:
Court rejects Apple's bid to
ban Samsung items
Los Angeles Times | December 17, 2012 | 9:22 PM
A
federal judge on Monday denied Apple Inc.'s request for a permanent ban on 26
Samsung products that a jury had found infringed on Apple patents for the iPhone
and the iPad.
But U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh also rejected Samsung's
motion for a new trial based on jury misconduct.
For the latest information
go to www.latimes.com.
--- T
he Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 02:16 AM EST |
Clickable:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/18/us-apple-samsung-idUSBRE8BH06620121218
--- The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: kg on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 02:16 AM EST |
Is jury tampering the right term?
Also, this ruling is hardly surprising, given that she said in the
hearing she had hoped to send them on their merry way to
appeals.
As for her recognition that only a very small subset of features
are infringing, that argument could be used in many instances.
Including copyright infringement, plagiarism, etc. Not that they
will ever go there, but it demonstrates the absurdity of modern
IP law.
---
IANAL
Linguist and Open Source Developer[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 18 2012 @ 03:32 AM EST |
Judge Koh to future Jurors:
"Go ahead and taint justice any which way you feel like it! Behave as an
expert witness, even if - no, no, ESPECIALLY if you have no clue as to what the
proper law, or facts are. Bonus 'expert' points if you stay at a Holiday Inn
Express, folks!"
Please excuse me, I need to go be sick now.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|