decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It's just a mining operation | 198 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Bite your tongue: emailing mp3 OR ogg files
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 02 2013 @ 03:43 PM EST

They'll apply for two, not the one:

    emailing mp3
    emailing ogg
That way they can ding people for two patents infringed!

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • I correct myself - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 02 2013 @ 04:45 PM EST
It's just a mining operation
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 02 2013 @ 06:45 PM EST
The sad thing is that this will go on irrespective of the
quality of the patent until it is invalidated, just on a
"cost of defense" basis. Even when the patent is thrown
out, those who have chosen to pay up will have little or no
legal recourse to get their money back.

And I don't see that the trolls have anything to lose by
pursuing scams like this. At worst, they waste their time
and effort. I'd love to see a judge throwing out these
patents and making these shysters pay damages to everyone
they have hassled, plus some criminal charges for fraud and
racketeering, but we are in a country that takes great pains
to allow deceptive and shady practices, if there is even the
slightest doubt that they could be legal.

IANAL, and I realize there are some pretty glaring
procedural flaws with what I half-jokingly suggest above,
but man are these guys low. People have wound up on the
receiving end of "vigilante justice" for less dishonorable
acts than these.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )