decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I disagree that Cook took a pay cut! | 198 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I disagree that Cook took a pay cut!
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 02 2013 @ 10:24 AM EST

There are indications in the article that last years "earnings" were highly abnormal. Otherwise he's earning roughly what Jobs pulled in (not counting total share values).

The fact he got a "signing bonus" (sort of) for becoming CEO which involved a lot of shares shouldn't be considered part of the normal annual pay.

But the article's use of the phrase "pay cut" is solely focused on the comparison of that "signing bonus" to no longer receiving it yearly.

The other facts as presented by the article:

    Jobs earned a salary of 1 Mil per year
    Cook had a base salary of 900 K which was raised to 1.4 Mil
    Cook received a bonus of salary * 200% for exceeding Apple's targets
    Cook did not receive an RSU (restricted stock unit) in 2012 given the RSU award for the promotion
    Cook recommended to the compensation board the CEO (and non-employee directors) is expected to own shares of company common stock with a value equal to 10 * base salary
    His colleagues "received hefty pay packages"
Point 4 on the RSU is interesting - it looks like Mr. Cook successfully negotiated a pretty high "signing bonus" and agreed to forgoe any RSU bonus for 2012 in exchange. My speculation.

There's absolutely nothing in what's presented in the article that shows Cook took a pay cut of any sort - unless you buy the "he took a pay cut because this year his signing bonus wasn't repeated" line of reasoning.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )