decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
SLAPP | 239 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
SLAPP
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 25 2012 @ 06:29 AM EST
Charles H. Schulz has written a piece that was psleiuhbd on Groklaw which
attempts to shed some light on the background of the dispute, and offers some
conjecture on what Meeks' motivation may be: Bear with me now: The
OpenOffice.org project is developing import filters for OpenXML, but not export
filters. Why? Because, I believe, it does not want to make a service to
Microsoft by being the second major office suite to produce OpenXML documents on
the fly. Novell sees this issue from a different point of view, but let's not
get carried away. Working with Microsoft on interoperability, as Novell claims,
includes working on OpenXML filters and plugins. While Novell contributes quite
normally to OpenOffice.org's import filters, it is also developing an OpenXML
export filter that won't be available in OpenOffice.org that is, if you choose
to use OpenOffice.org and not Open Office, Novell Edition . And since these
export filters are supposedly developed in collaboration with Microsoft, this
technology would logically include Microsoft's sacred intellectual property that
Sun and many others don't want to see covered by the JCA. This could, perhaps,
explain Michael's odd questions on this list of OpenOffice.org

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )