decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Link? | 239 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Mistrial in Iowa today
Authored by: PJ on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 02:52 PM EST
It could be just a mistake. But that is
exactly why they ask each juror one by one
if that is how they voted.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Link?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 06:03 PM EST

I'd really like to read about this.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Mistrial in Iowa today
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 06:11 PM EST
http://www.wral.com/iowa-wrongful-imprisonment-case-ends-in-mistrial/11881300/

"After a week of deliberation, jurors signaled they had verdicts early
Friday afternoon. But once in the courtroom, three women on the 12-person jury
said they didn't agree with the verdict read in court.

It caught Pratt and the attorneys in the case by surprise, with the judge saying
he's never had that happen before. After a private consultation, Pratt declared
a mistrial."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Clicky Here
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 06:35 PM EST


I checked a whole bunch of news reports. This one is the has the most complete report - the exact same wording is in a couple of other places. There are several variations which leave out parts.

The Olympian

This was a case I'd been following. I have an interest in wrongful convictions, and knew that the two men involved were suing the police.

That three of the jurors stood up in court and said that they didn't agree with the verdict is really interesting. Something happened.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Mistrial in Iowa today
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 15 2012 @ 05:29 PM EST
The sound of the story makes me think that the women did it deliberately this
way. Perhaps they felt that if they kept deliberating jurors might object to how
they deliberate and get them kicked off, with the result a finding for the
defendant instead of a mistrial.

If that is the case, the judge should find them in the clkink and toss them in
jail for a while.

Mouse the Lucky Dog

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )