|
|
|
| Authored by: dio gratia on Saturday, December 15 2012 @ 04:06 PM EST |
The difference between the Tunis Agenda and Tunis Commitment leading to the
present results demonstrates the principal of long term agendas of which both
Russia and China are able proponents.
They ask for more than they get, come back and ask for more again until they
have eventually achieved their goals. It shows a great deal of determination
and patience while the rest of us are in danger of waking up and finding the
camel has wiggled all the way under the tent skirt.
Notice the page 24 resolution you excerpted above from the WCIT-12 Final Acts
is all directed at increasing ITU's influence over the Internet, as does ยง35 of
the Tunis Agenda.
Try googling for 'ITU Guadalajara resolutions filetype:pdf' and you'll find
individual PDFs for all three resolutions (101, 102 and 133) from the 2010
Guadalajara conference. They all directly read on the Internet.
That so much of the documentation Guadalajara Plenipotentiary document trail
requires a login likely relates to public relations, that the Russian hand in
the sock puppet is likely too readily apparent.
That the language of the ITU is so self referential to previous works while
serving to reduce the size of resulting documents also serves to require
inculcation into the process incidentally denying ready public participation.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
