|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 10:13 PM EST |
Well the way I see it, if she throws out the jury verdict
there will be a retrial and if she doesn't there will be a
file for appeal. Either way the trial will go on.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 12:17 AM EST |
She seems to be passing the buck to someone else.
Given the complexity of this case and the likelihood that pretty much everything
she decided will be appealed, it makes perfect sense to me.
If she tosses the jury verdict it makes even more sense.
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 11:02 AM EST |
This was perhaps a easy pass for her since Apple added
things outside the
trial. It does appear similar to her
recent denial
of Samsung's expert
declaration:
Because the Court has ruled
that the declaration
may not be filed at all, the request to file it and its
supporting exhibits under seal is DENIED as
moot. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
