|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 09:00 PM EST |
I have to admit to a lot of curiosity. Exactly how much impact did the other
cases that Apple is involved in have on the Judge's decision?
Judge Posner was, um, quite direct in his criticism. So was the British court
which ordered Apple to post the apology on their website.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 09:33 PM EST |
| Please mention the mistake in the title of your post. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 09:35 PM EST |
| For all posts that are not On Topic. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- To Big to Fail, FAILS - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 02:18 AM EST
- Arduino announces ready-to-play Esplora - Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 06:58 AM EST
- How to unGPL GPLed software. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 07:19 AM EST
- NASA combats the conspiracy theorists: - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 08:11 AM EST
- Dave Hester sues Storage Wars, claim show is faked - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 08:12 AM EST
- Code-breaking ‘hero’ Alan Turing deserves to be pardoned, scientists plead - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 08:21 AM EST
- EU settles eBook pricing war. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 09:37 AM EST
- Fast DNA origami opens way for nanoscale machines - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 09:38 AM EST
- totally off topic: 0.99999999999.... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 10:20 AM EST
| |
| Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 09:37 PM EST |
Please mention the news story's name in the title of the top
post. A link back to the story in the top post is also
helpful because they eventually fall off the Home page.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 09:40 PM EST |
Please post all transcriptions of Comes exhibits here for PJ
to find. Please post the html in plain text Post Mode so that
they can be easily copied.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 09:54 PM EST |
"The Court does not find it advisable to issue binding interpretations
under foreign law, or to inquire into the precise contours of the implied
factual findings underlying a jury verdict, where it is not necessary for the
resolution of the currently pending case."
Sounds to me like she is hinting that she is going to let the verdict stand in
total. Oh well. On to the CAFC.
Mouse the Lucky Dog[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 10:53 PM EST |
It would seem Apple isn't getting the sweetheart deal
they expected from an
American court. Good. Now if the judge
in
Washington state can wake up to the
reality that Microsoft
is playing him ... Samsung I'm less
then happy with,
but that's personal.
My Samsung Rugby Smart, touted as being waterproof
to 3
ft, dust
and
dirt proof, scratch proof ... a phone good for a
contractor
that drops phones, is broken at three months. The front
bezel, a
plastic ring around the surface, is pealing off;
that's what keeps the dust and
water out. The phone's only
heavy use is going into my trouser pocket.
According to
Samsung, this type of physical damage is not warrantied.
I'll be
filing a complaint with the State of California over
that. Normal, expected,
use should be covered.
Imagine Toyota saying the paint pealing in the
rain was
not covered? Perhaps Koreans don't have trouser pockets, so
this
property wasn't tested?
AT&T's song and dance that they just 'pass'
on the
manufacturer's warranty, well that's got me thinking finding
a cell
phone company with a brain. For some types of damage
they should hold the
manufacturer's feet to the fire.
Likely it's time to buy the Google Nexus
and divorce a
commitment to any cell phone company. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, December 14 2012 @ 07:04 AM EST |
| I just love that phrase! It is typical of certain politicians, mediocre
managers, and others, who are too scared to make decisions in case they are
wrong. Each of us will know of a few who do that regularly. Very frustrating for
everyone around. Some call it sitting on the fence. I hear that does no good
at all to certain parts of the anatomy..... [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
