decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse | 264 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 02:26 AM EST
Again, this makes no sense. Short of injunctive relief what
relief does a patent holder have to someone infringing? Why do
FRAND patent holders somehow get less protection because they promised to not
discriminate, and offer for fair and
reasonable prices?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 04:52 AM EST
How is an investigation (and an ongoing lawsuit is essentially an investigation)
evendence of anything other than "enough people have complained"?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 06:52 AM EST
Are you aware that no court or administrative
agency has yet ruled that injunctions are not
available to FRAND patent owners? And have
you considered that to say they can't use
injunctions would be to change the rules of
the road *after* the patents have been
donated to the standard?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

wait, what?
Authored by: designerfx on Thursday, December 13 2012 @ 11:26 AM EST
so you're leaving because you got debunked?

that's a heck of an insulting view to take, not unlike
everyone else who proclaims that FRAND abuse is somehow
rampant.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )