decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse | 264 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 09:14 PM EST
PJ,

I posted the more full version above, along with the requested "citations
to
authority". As I can now see from this post, it appears that nothing less
than a
full jury verdict finding "FRAND abuse" occurred will suffice for
evidence;
given opinions here about Apple v. Samsung, perhaps only a jury verdict,
appeals, etc.

Again, I think that FRAND abuse is seeking injunctive relief, in line with
Posner's opinion. From your latest post, it is clear that you think that this is

just fine, and part of a natural defense due to the... something Microsoft et al

have hatched up. No worries- we all have opinions!

As for the rest, I'm sorry I riled people up, and you don't have to ban me, as I

won't be back. This has been eye-opening! Good luck with explaining the law
to the techies.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )