decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You read too many propaganda | 148 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Democracy inverted in Europe?
Authored by: kg on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 01:54 AM EST
I found it ironic (and almost delightful) that the European
Commission's response to the resounding defeat of the EU
Constitution in France was to say that obviously the people
didn't understand it, so they wanted to run another PR
campaign and put it up to vote again.

(Then they scrapped it, and didn't ask... and don't call it
a constitution...)

The best part about that constitution was the bill of
rights, that was about 100pp long (I kid you not) and after
ever enumerated right, it contained the disclaimer that you
were guaranteed this right as implemented by your member
state. Talk about ambiguity.

---
IANAL
Linguist and Open Source Developer

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You read too many propaganda
Authored by: Winter on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 03:13 AM EST
"The EU is a bureaucratic behemoth existing primarily for the benefit of
finance and industry and it is on the brink of splitting at the seams as a
consequence."

"Brussels" has less civil servants than the municipalities of Greater
London, or Paris, or Berlin. Bureaucracy begins at home.

What stings in many countries is that the one thing the EU does effectively is
suppressing protectionism, cartels, and worker discrimination.

The next time you hear complaints about some "bureaucratic regulation from
Brussels", think about the ways that problem was used to block imports from
other community member states, or to discriminate against foreign workers, or to
defraud consumers.

Case in point is the UK, who were rumored to join the EU only to destroy it from
the inside ("Yes minister").

The UK opposition against technical harmonization in, eg, power plugs, was
mainly motivated by protectionism. Opposition against Polish migrant workers
seem to fuel a lot of the anti-EU feelings.


---
Some say the sun rises in the east, some say it rises in the west; the truth
lies probably somewhere in between.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )