I do believe that OpenStreetmap and associated projects are doing very much
better.....
I used to be enthousiastic about OpenStreetMap, also
contributing some fixes concerning my neighbourhood, but then realized the one
glaring flaw in their approach: OpenStreetMap is great in areas with lots of
active users, but barebones elsewhere. Mapping places that you don't live in
(and where few people live), and which are not interesting for special some
reason is boring, unglamorous drudgery. So the only information in them (if any)
comes from some public databases in the best case (but these releases may be
dated), guesswork from satellite imagery in the worst. I think the OpenStreetMap
project has a deal with some satellite image outfit for such fallback
material.
No, I would not trust my life on OpenStreetMap.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|