Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Right Hand, Meet Left Hand | 343 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

WCIT-12 Leak seeks to define "government-controlled internet"

Authored by: PJ on Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 07:04 AM EST

There is a difference between banning something
by passing a law againt it and banning it
by blocking it from existence.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

WCIT-12 Leak seeks to define "government-controlled internet" - Authored by: JamesK on Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 08:30 AM EST
- WCIT-12 Leak seeks to define "government-controlled internet" - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 10:56 PM EST
  - "Seizing" Domain Names - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 04:21 AM EST
  - WCIT-12 Leak seeks to define "government-controlled internet" - Authored by: JamesK on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 08:34 AM EST
    - WCIT-12 Leak seeks to define "government-controlled internet" - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 10:22 AM EST
    - Move the root servers out of US - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 01:43 PM EST

Right Hand, Meet Left Hand

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 04:30 AM EST

The U.S. govt. does many inconsistent things. As pointed out by others on this
thread it "seizes" domain names while deploring censorship and
Internet control in other countries. It funds development of the Tor Project
while embracing legislation like PIPA/SOPA that (at least one of them) sounded
to me very much like it might make the distribution of such software illegal. I
am sure many other examples exist. I *do* wish my (U.S.) govt would be as
concerned with Internet freedom in this country as they are elsewhere.

(And yes, I am the author of "'Seizing' domain names", above.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Right Hand, Meet Left Hand - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 07:33 AM EST

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )