decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple and Samsung File The Lists and a New Dispute on an Expert Declaration ~pj | 343 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple and Samsung File The Lists and a New Dispute on an Expert Declaration ~pj
Authored by: calris74 on Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 10:13 PM EST
Excellent point! I remember having to write essays of 'at
least x [pages,words]'. We should be teaching our kids at a
much younger age to make (and support) their point in 'at most
x [pages,words]'. In the real world, if you can't make your
point in 20 seconds or less, your point will be lost

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple and Samsung File The Lists and a New Dispute on an Expert Declaration ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 10 2012 @ 10:24 AM EST
Legal arguments are not homework for school. Litigants
should be allowed to provide sufficient information to
fully support their arguments. Placing arbitrary
limitations on the length of legal documents makes as much
sense as limiting the sizes of computer program source code
regardless of what it does. Perthaps engineering drawings
and calculations should be limited in length regardless
of whether they are for an outhouse or a nuclear power
plant.

Perhaps the Judge doesn't want to spend the next ten years
doing Apple vs Samsung. But, then how can one expect true
justice to be served if the judge is not willing to listen
to each sides arguments in full?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )