decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I am puzzled | 134 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I am not puzzled
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 08 2012 @ 02:14 PM EST
You don't watch enough YouTube, or you'd be aware that a
camera (any camera) preferrably handheld, in front of the TV
is de rigeur. Extra points come from some of the weirdest
Heath Robinson (Rube Goldberg for others) ways of recording
video. Sometimes truly archival material exists in the "public"
domain only in the form the unfortunate uploader could
capture it :(

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I am puzzled
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 08 2012 @ 02:25 PM EST
Adding to my reply above I am now puzzled by the motive for
posting this on YT. The poster has only this one video, which
appears to me may have been recorded on a phone camera
at an overflow or subsidiary monitor in the Senate/Courthouse.
Still, it does add to the historical record, and archivists
must take material in whatever format it arrives. Pity about
the uncouth audience.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Isn't it the only legal way to record?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 12:14 AM EST
Didn't the RIAA state in some senate hearing that everyone has the ability to
use a recording camera to take 'fair use' snips from a TV or monitor and as such
there needs to be no exemption for ripping DVD within the DMCA.

If so, maybe it was the RIAA follower that uploaded :)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )