decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why bother to even have a trial? | 170 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
First Report from the Apple v Samsung Hearing - Judge Koh Takes It Under Advisement ~pj Updated
Authored by: PJ on Friday, December 07 2012 @ 05:50 PM EST
I was surprised that this wasn't stressed, frankly,
but there are probably cases that make it hard to
win that way. It is in the JMOL motion, though,
for sure.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

First Report from the Apple v Samsung Hearing - Judge Koh Takes It Under Advisement ~pj Updated
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 07 2012 @ 06:44 PM EST
I had a nephew convicted of first degree murder, later overturned when it was
shown that the prosecution withheld the location of a key defense witness. Jury
interviews demonstrated that one of the jurors basically ruled out considering
reasonable doubt by forcefully presenting the argument that if he wasn't guilty,
they wouldn't have put him on trial. The two pieces of good news to this are 1)
he is free and made a decent life for himself, and 2) relating this story
quickly gets me excluded from the jury pool. :-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Why bother to even have a trial?
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Friday, December 07 2012 @ 07:14 PM EST
Oh, wait, that question was already raised wasn't it?


---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )