decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
No, no, no | 170 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
No, no, no
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 07 2012 @ 02:22 AM EST
It's obvious that if competitors were allowed to make knock-offs
of obsolete Apple products this would dilute their value as
collectors items, objets d'art, technology investments,
worth as much as Apple stock options ...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"We have a strong sense of residual goodwill"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 07 2012 @ 01:24 PM EST
The analogy that if Chevy made a car like an old Mustang reminded me of this
joke, and I think cars/computers are an apple/oranges argument.

Going "retro" in computers does not garner goodwill... or very
little.

-----------------------------------------

At a recent computer exposition, Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer
industry with the auto industry and stated: "If General Motors had kept up
with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving
$25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, GM issued a press release stating: "If
General Motors had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving
cars with the following characteristics:

1) For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2) Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new
car.
3) Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have
to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the
car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some
reason, you would simply accept this.
4) Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car
to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall
the engine.
5) Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five
times as fast and twice as easy to drive -- but would run on only five percent
of the roads.
6) The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be
replaced by a single "General Protection Fault" warning light.
7) The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8) Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and
refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the
key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9) Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers would have to learn to drive
all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as
the old car.
10)You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )