|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 06 2012 @ 06:56 AM EST |
Thats exactly what the DMCA is all about. Dotcom contends
that he was always
in compliance with the DMCA; and in that
case its not a criminal matter.
And there are further insurmountable technicalities:
"The
Federal Rules do not contemplate service of a criminal
summons on a wholly
foreign corporation without an agent or
offices in the United States,".
... Megaupload did not have offices in the U.S. The
summons were
not properly served.
you might also want to read this:
NY-Times[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 06 2012 @ 01:27 PM EST |
> breaking copyright law for financial gain is a criminal offence over here!
and AFAIK in US, and NZ.
> Dotcom contends that he was always in compliance with the DMCA;
[from the anon reply to Wol's post]
And there is the basis of the case. "Somebody" claims he violated
their copyright for financial gain (IIRC there was a threshold $75K),
and "Somebody" claims he violated DMCA. March in the lawyers,
Game On.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
