|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 04 2012 @ 04:23 PM EST |
He is very good at calling it as he sees it and the accuracy is usually far
better than semi.
Too bad, I will miss it, but since my interest in the articles and analysis
don't directly enrich me financially, I won't be enriching them, other than with
a wish of good luck.
I wonder if somebody paid them to do this?
Semi-sealed.
Charlie,it _IS_ as bad as it sounds.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 04 2012 @ 04:47 PM EST |
Charlie is fairly good at spotting fundamental changes. He needs revenue to
do good investigative reporting.
On a bigger scale, has anyone else noticed
how incredibly vacuous most of the articles on the Internet are? Any idea what
to do about it? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: riodeg242 on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 09:36 AM EST |
| This works for me. LWN.net has
been doing a
variation of this for a while. And I subscribe.
I don't often read
semiaccurate, and don't need
instantaneous information. But just might
subscribe because
I like their integrity and the model. Gotta vote with your
wallet these days... [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
