|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 04 2012 @ 12:40 PM EST |
Did you even bother to read the full article? the judge
states why parts of the agreement are sealed and others
aren't. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 04 2012 @ 03:32 PM EST |
Umm, judge LUCY Koh might prefer to be referred to as "she".
Just sayin'...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 11:05 AM EST |
What? WHAT?
If this wasn't in the United States, you wouldn't be finding
out jack. It has nothing to do with you as a consumer. It
has to do with the United States' liberal rules of
discovery, and extremely open access to court records
(presumption against sealing records).
Put another way- two private parties enter into a contract.
You, *as a consumer*, have no rights to know what that
contract is.
However, in the United States, we have extremely liberal
rules regarding discovery (what people are allowed to get in
court cases). Moreover, we have a strong presumption that
documents for court cases that are filed will be accessible
to the public.
This can create tension.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|