decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Explore Government Subsidies | 173 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Software Patents... (Getting involved)
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 01 2012 @ 01:44 PM EST
Are there websites out there that allow common-folk to provide proof of prior
art to the patent office in regards to specific patents? I seem to remember a
link posted here on Groklaw a while back, but I can't find it (my imagination,
perhaps?).

Thanks.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple says it didn't find out about jury foreman
Authored by: Jim Olsen on Sunday, December 02 2012 @ 09:43 AM EST

In the recent Apple-Samsung patent suit, Business Week reports that Apple did not find out about the jury foreman's suit against Seagate until Samsung complained of it post-verdict. Apparently Apple found out about Velvin Hogan's bankruptcy on July 30 (after jury selection) but did not get the bankruptcy file until alerted by Samsung's filing.

This blows up Apple's argument that Samsung should have found out about the matter earlier, and that therefore Samsung cannot complain about it now.

---
Jim ---

Success in crime always invites to worse deeds. - Lord Coke

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Explore Government Subsidies
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 02 2012 @ 12:42 PM EST


The New York Times has been studying Government Subsidies to Corporations in the United States, and has put the information online. Subsidies are usually granted based on a promise of jobs for the local economy.

Canada also has subsidy problems. Caterpillar bought a Canadian locomotive plant which had received subsidies, and then closed it, moving the jobs and technology out of the country. Needless to say, Caterpillar did not volunteer to pay back the subsidies.

Link here

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Texas, RFID and the “Mark of the Beast” - Oh My!
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 02 2012 @ 03:00 PM EST
The theology behind a battle over RFID tags
By now, you've probably heard the story: exemplary student Andrea Hernandez has decided to fight her San Antonio high school's plan to outfit every student with an RFID-equipped badge in order to better take attendance and track students while on school property. (Radio frequency identification tags are short-range tracking tags that can be scanned by local readers, though they don't enable any sort of GPS-style location tracking of a student's movements around town, at home, etc.)

Hernandez objects to the plan, which the district instituted in order to better recover its daily per-pupil funding from the state of Texas, on the grounds that it was a terrific invasion of her privacy—and of her religious liberty.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • But hardly new - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 03:50 PM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )