|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 01 2012 @ 03:43 PM EST |
I'd almost expect Motorola to try to get the judge to narrow this (that is, ask
whether injunction is possible if Microsoft rejects the judge's rate). Getting
it back on the table even in that reduced form would be huge for negotiation I'd
think.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 02 2012 @ 04:09 AM EST |
The logic here is that by agreeing to be part of a standard (SEP),
Motorola has
given up their right to injunctive relief.
Now
remember the totally flawed "OpenXML" standard process where Microsoft was able
to "standardize" elements that state "do this like Word does"?
It would seem
that this totally wishy-washy specification then means that everything that Word
does is standard-relevant, and consequently all software patents implemented in
Word are standard-relevant and don't warrant injunctive relief. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 11:17 AM EST |
Moto isn't barred from an injunction, the EU Court does not recognize the
authority of a US flunky making clearly prejudiced decisions.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
