decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
While I'd agree he likely comitted perjury | 219 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
While I'd agree he likely comitted perjury
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 04 2012 @ 04:03 PM EST

Your and my definition of perjury does not necessarily equate to the Legal definition.

The transcript makes for some very interesting reading and while there were two individuals who were sworn in, Mr. Steele was - unfortunately - not one of those. Probably because he was sitting in the "peanut gallery" rather than at the plaintiff's desk.

I think it would have been very interesting if the Judge had proceeded to have Mr. Steele sworn in and then asked some rather pointed questions about his involvement. I'd love to have seen something in the transcript like:

    Judge: If your involvement is non-existent, why were you talking to someone in the Court whose attention should have been on me?
    You keep interfering with my court room and I'll have you arrested for contempt, do we understand each other?
:)

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )