decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not reading the terminal disclaimer right | 219 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not reading the terminal disclaimer right
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 04:49 PM EST
The exceptions to Apple's disclaimer are:

"expires for failure to pay a maintenance fee; is held unenforceable;
is found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction; is statutorily disclaimed
in whole or terminally disclaimed under 37 CFR 1.321;
has all claims canceled by a reexamination certificate; is reissued;
or is in any manner terminated prior to the expiration of its full statutory term
as presently shortened by any terminal disclaimer"

Under any of these exceptions the disclaimer is no longer in force.
Like PJ said a lot of backdoor exits.

Hard to believe Apple has the moxie to include these exceptions in it's filing.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not reading the terminal disclaimer right
Authored by: soronlin on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 05:54 PM EST
This is probably important, since several people including PJ seem to be mis-reading it.
The patent owner, Apple Inc., of 100 percent interest in the U.S. Patent No. D618,677 hereby disclaims, except as provided below, the terminal part of the statutory term of U.S. patent No. D618,677 which would extend beyond the expiration date of the full statutory term of prior U.S. Patent No. D593,087, as the term of said prior patent is defined in 35 U.S.C. 154 and 173, and as the the term of said prior patent is presently shortened by any terminal disclaimer. The patent owner hereby agrees that U.S. Patent No. D618,677 and the prior patent are commonly owned. This agreement is binding upon the patent owner, its successors, or assigns.

In making the above disclaimer, the patent owner does not disclaim the terminal part of the term of U.S. Patent No. D618,677 that would extend to the expiration date of the full statutory term as defined in 35 U.S.C. 154 and 173 of the prior patent, as the term of said prior patent is presently shortened by any terminal disclaimer, in the event that said prior patent later: expires for failure to pay a maintenance fee; is held unenforceable; is found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction; is statutorily disclaimed in whole or temrinally disclaimed under 37 CFR 1.321; has all claims canceled by a reexamination certificate; is reissued; or is in any manner terminated prior to the expiration of its full statutory term as presently shortened by any terminal disclaimer.

This parses as follows:
Apple Inc., disclaims, the terminal part of the statutory term of U.S. patent No. D618,677 which would extend beyond the expiration date of the full statutory term of prior U.S. Patent No. D593,087
So '677 does not survive past the end of '087.

The second paragraph describes what happens if:

[U.S. Patent No. D593,087] later: expires for failure to pay a maintenance fee; is held unenforceable; is found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction; is statutorily disclaimed in whole or temrinally disclaimed under 37 CFR 1.321; has all claims canceled by a reexamination certificate; is reissued; or is in any manner terminated prior to the expiration of its full statutory term as presently shortened by any terminal disclaimer.
ie if '087 terminates before its statutory date, and in this event:
[Apple Inc.] does not disclaim the terminal part of the term of U.S. Patent No. D618,677 that would extend to the expiration date of the full statutory term ... of [U.S. Patent No. D593,087].
The rest is legal verbiage that has no effect on the sense of the words.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )