|
| Authored by: artp on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 09:33 AM EST |
Depends on how they reviewed the matter. If they just
examined the paper trail instead of speaking to everybody,
then the upshot is that they were just looking for evidence
instead of facts.
All speculation, wouldn't stand up in court, I don't trust
them anyhow.
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 09:55 AM EST |
Does this mean that they identified some other personor persons who did
know or does it
mean they limited their search to only members of the litgation teams?
If I was lawyering for Samsung I would be tempted to ask them to say which
and if someone else did know I would want to do discovery on all their
communication files and a deposition.
Chris B[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: PJ on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 10:25 AM EST |
It is possible they phrased it that way to cover
themselves, just in case someone lied to them, for
example. Or just because lawyers think about
worst case scenarios and try to avoid them, by
nature. They could simply be saying, we asked and
we don't think anybody knew. But we can't
guarantee it, in that people and people, but we
did check and we found nothing.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
