decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
We have not *identified* any attorney ... who was aware ... | 219 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
We have not *identified* any attorney ... who was aware ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 02 2012 @ 08:38 PM EST
Just to clarfiy my above post, I think the placing of the comma is critical in reading this..

As it was originally, ie we all knew..
We have not identified any attorney or other member of the litigation teams who was aware that Mr. Hogan had been a party to lawsuits involving Seagate until after the conclusion of trial, when Samsung raised the matter in connection with its post-trial motions.
As it should be if no-one knew..
We have not identified any attorney or other member of the litigation teams who was aware that Mr. Hogan had been a party to lawsuits involving Seagate, until after the conclusion of trial when Samsung raised the matter in connection with its post-trial motions.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

We have not *identified* any attorney ... who was aware ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 02 2012 @ 10:29 PM EST
How about people outside the litigation team ?


For example an outside investigator that knew it and some attorney outside the
litigation team who was aware of the facts but decided to not tell the attorneys
in the litigation teams so the team had deniability.

That way they could use it if the trial didn't go their way.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The problem with double-negatives
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 03 2012 @ 11:36 AM EST
The problem with double-negatives is that some people think they should be used
for emphasis.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )