decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
all software patents are like that | 456 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
all software patents are like that
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 06:57 PM EST
the apparatus is always a long-winded legalese description which (if translated into plain English) boils down to "a general-purpose computer".

They are all patents on using a general-purpose calculating machine, to perform specific mathematical calculations whose results can be interpreted as having a certain semantic meaning.

...Even arithmetic coding, which is closer to a "pure math" application than most pieces of software, is effectively the same thing as a supposedly-different thing called "range coding". The math makes them completely equivalent, but range coding was published in the public domain in the late 70's, and people were still getting patents on arithmetic coding in the 90's.

That's one of the many problems with allowing patents on abstractions, on ideas, on mathematics. Even recognizing that two patents or publications describe the same subject matter seems to be beyond the capabilities of the patent system. How can we demand that all programmers everywhere deal with it?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

how about these?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 04:31 AM EST
Governments are generally mass-murdering psychopaths with a definite habit of
getting things wrong all the time.

If you wish to claim that the law is 100% correct, then you also claim that
politicians are unnessecary.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )