decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
So you took a Screenshot... | 456 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Six Provo office buildings sold to East Bay Technology Park
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 11:29 AM EST
The Salt Lake City office of CBRE announced that Utah developer, Warren "Pat" King, has purchased a six-building office park that was formerly a part of Novell’s corporate campus in Provo.

Six Provo office buildings sold to East Bay Technology Park

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Off topic here please
Authored by: red floyd on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 03:17 PM EST
Punishment is to have Gilligan be your lab assistant at work.

---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

3D Systems suing Formlabs
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 06:08 PM EST
3D Systems has announced it is bringing suit in Federal District Court against Formlabs and Kickstarter, seeking injunctive relief and damages for alleged infringement of a patent relating to how the startup’s light-based printer operates.

Clicky Wired

Roger

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Weev Lives
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 07:55 PM EST
Interesting essay on the guy behind the AT&T iPad ID disclosure,
27-year-old hacker and internet troll Andrew "Weev" Auernheimer from

gawker.com   Language Warning

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Flexible rectangles with rounded corners!
Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 04:47 AM EST
BBC

Just wait for the patent trolls, once the fist one goes on sale!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Evolution Teaching
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 04:53 AM EST
UK's Royal Society wants action

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Was Darl onto something ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 04:57 AM EST
BBC reports

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft's Common Public License
Authored by: odysseus on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 06:07 AM EST

Can anyone suggest a good source for info and analysis of Microsoft's Common Public License (CPL)? On the KDE Licensing list we've been asked for a special exception to our licensing policy to use the CPL to build Windows Installers using Microsoft's Wix library which is licensed under the CPL. We're inclined to grant the exception solely for Windows installers, but I'd like us to have more info and analysis on the license before we do do. Anyone know of any special gotcha's with the CPL?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Dept. of Justice, FTC to Hold Workshop on Patent Assertion Entities
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 06:51 AM EST
WASHINGTON – The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced today that they will hold a joint public workshop on Dec. 10, 2012, to explore the impact of patent assertion entity (PAE) activities on innovation and competition and the implications for antitrust enforcement and policy.

This workshop will examine the economic and legal implications of PAE activity, as distinct from prototypical “non-practicing entity” (NPE) activity, such as developing and transferring technology. By contrast, PAE activities often include purchasing patents from existing owners and seeking to maximize revenues by licensing the intellectual property to (or litigating against) manufacturers who are already using the patented technology.

Supporters of the PAE business model say that it facilitates the transfer of patent rights, rewards inventors and funds ongoing research and development efforts. Critics describe adverse effects on competition and innovation, including increased costs and a lack of technology transfer, ultimately taxing consumers and industry.

The workshop will provide a forum for industry participants, academics, economists, lawyers and other interested parties to discuss the economic and legal analyses of PAE activity. It will consist of a series of panels examining, among other topics, the legal treatment of PAE activity, economic theories concerning PAE activity and industry experiences. Panelists for the workshop will include academics, private attorneys, economists and industry representatives.

The Department of Justice and the FTC are interested in receiving comments on PAE activities and will accept written submissions from the public before the workshop and until March 10, 2013. Interested parties may submit public comments to: ATR.LPS-PAEPublicComments@usdoj.gov . Submitted comments will be made publicly available on the Department of Justice and FTC websites.

The all-day workshop is free and open to the public. Individuals are encouraged to register by Dec. 5, 2012, for the workshop by sending an email to: ATR.LPS- PAEWorkshopRSVP@usdoj.gov . Please include “RSVP” in the subject line. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis.

The workshop will take place at the FTC’s satellite conference center at 601 New Jersey Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EST on Dec. 10, 2012. Additional participants will be added to the agenda as they are confirmed. Updates to the agenda will be posted on the Department of Justice and FTC websites. The workshop will include the following panels, presentations and confirmed participants:

U.S. Dept. of Justice.

According to the agenda, the third session's topic is" How Does Antitrust Apply to the Potential Efficiencies and Harms Generated by PAE Activity".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Whorer King Coins Half Counterfeit
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 11:08 AM EST


Swedish Authorities have been investigating coins with libelous wording, defaming the King. They've determined that real coins were milled out, and then a new face glued in place. This is really fine workmanship, the coins are, other than the wording, and a 0.47 gram weight difference, indistinguishable from an unmodified coin.

Someone must be really mad at the King. This would have cost a lot of money, equipment to do this sort of work isn't cheap. So somewhere, some machinist, has been running a side project on his boss's equipment.

link here

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Push for Patents
Authored by: artp on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 02:05 PM EST

On November 23, the Des Moines Register had a front page article entitled The Push for Patents, subtitled "Royalties Cushion Budget Cuts". And we here in Iowa know that when you elect Terry Branstad, that budget cuts are coming to EVERYONE!

So it is a timely and relevant article here in Iowa, and I'm sure the natives took notice, although I was incommunicado for the next 7 days. Here's a summary.

The University of Iowa took a $37 million dollar cut in royalties from patents from 2009 to 2011, from $43 to $6 million due to one expired drug patent based on the cytomegalovirus promoter. [Note: I have no idea what I just typed.]

The U of Minnesota dropped $75 million in royalties over the same period. An expired anti-AIDS drug accounted for $10 million of that loss last year. Northwestern leads the nation with $191 million in royalties in 2011, mostly from Lyrica, an anti-seizure drug that is also being used for fibromyalgia.

It also notes that patent royalty income to universities increased 4% each year from 2009, so the losers lose big when a popular patent expires.

Here's one quote from the article:

The sharp 2009-11 drop comes as all universities face a “perfect storm” of destabilized state and federal funding, said Richard Bendis, CEO of Innovation America, a Philadelphia-based nonprofit that has helped universities commercialize research.

University researchers often spend more than a decade developing a breakout technology that singlehandedly generates millions of dollars, Bendis said. That makes it hard to know when the next big technological breakthrough will come through, and in turn makes it difficult to maintain consistent earnings, he said.

...

Royalties and private dollars remain a small slice of overall research funding, but they provide a cushion against drops in state funding and uncertain federal government dollars.

Among the fears of research universities: As Congress considers budget cuts to address ongoing deficits, money for basic research is categorized as discretionary spending. So research money is more susceptible to cuts than areas like health care and the military, said Dan Reed, University of Iowa vice president for research and economic development.

Reed represents an emerging type of hire for universities because of his private sector experience. He spent nearly 25 years in higher education, but arrived in Iowa City this fall after a five-year stint at Microsoft.

I note with alarm one more connection to Microsoft at Iowa. I also note with interest that there is a company that helps universities "monetize" their research.

---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley sinks ?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So you took a Screenshot...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 03:29 PM EST
to eliminate the EXIF data on that picture.
Is your ID still visible in your screenshot?

exiftool

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Hard Numbers
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 05:54 PM EST
Windows device sales (four weeks since W8 release) -21% yoy,
W8 tablet sales <1% Windows devices. npd group

Charlie Demerjian has his usual jolly rant at semiaccurate.com

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Facebook: 'social network of the past'
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 06:30 PM EST
"We don't have to make next week's payroll by jamming ads at users."
Bradley Horowitz, Google+

But The Register wonders where does he get next week's payroll?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Raspberry not everybody's taste of Pi
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 30 2012 @ 09:50 PM EST
register.co.uk

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )