decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
No: That internal state is still debuggable...just the dictionary is further away.. | 456 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
What Does "Software Is Mathematics" Mean? Part 2: A Semiotics Approach to the Patent Eligibility of Software by PolR
Authored by: PolR on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 11:15 AM EST
Not all debuggers are symbolic debuggers. The ability to inspect the internal
state doesn't depend on the debugging facilities provided by a compiler. These
facilities just make thing easier.

Besides, if the debugging facilities are left in, the software still infringe.
The patent reads on code which is can be inspected by your standard.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What Does "Software Is Mathematics" Mean? Part 2: A Semiotics Approach to the Patent Eligibility of Software by PolR
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 11:58 AM EST
>Couldn't it be reasonably argued that production code has removed the
debugging capabilities...

No. PoIR is right. In this context, debugging is merely the process of comparing
those mathematically (logically) calculated sign-vehicles to
referents--referents which some human thinks they should correspond to. It's ALL
about human thought!

So ALL debugging capabilities are in the human mind. And so long as there's a
human mind to interpret the bits as program instructions, debugging can occur.

Further, you can't possibly remove debugging "capabilities" from a
program. You can removing debugging "facilities". That is, you can
make it harder for that human to debug, but you cannot make it impossible.

Is this all theoretical smoke-blowing? Speaking as someone who has written
symbolic memory dumps for compilers, and has worked with people who WROTE the
"debuggers" on three different systems--I assure you that if necessary
another program can write whatever debugging facilities are needed can be
written.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No: That internal state is still debuggable...just the dictionary is further away..
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 01:00 PM EST
It's just that some of the automated aids to interpretation (debug symbols, etc)
have been put far away. Ever heard of "reverse engineering",
dissasembling, etc?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Because I don't understand Japanese - does that mean it's not a language?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 03:01 PM EST

For those of us developers that can read Hex and understand binary - the compiled state of software is still readable.

Just because you might not be able to read and interpret compiled form - doesn't mean others can't.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What Does "Software Is Mathematics" Mean? Part 2: A Semiotics Approach to the Patent Eligibility of Software by PolR
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 07:05 PM EST
Programmers can recover a lot of that meaning just by looking at the compiled
binary code, even if there is no debugging info at all to make the process
easier.

I sometimes have to do that sort of thing in my day job as a game developer.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )