decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I'd have to agree | 456 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I'd have to agree
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 07:00 PM EST

Especially given the original comment to the start of the thread does absolutely nothing to touch on any point of discussion - it simply verbalizes personal attacks as a means of saying the article is (putting it nicely) meaningless.

Examples include:

It will be of exactly ZERO use
You do such a great job of making simple nuances complicated
such obfuscatory drivel comes naturally
My My... given Mr. Quinn's reaction to the Supreme's in the last couple rulings - I'd definitely have to agree that this has struck a nerve. Not as large a nerve (yet) that the Supreme's struck - but we're apparently making ground.

You know our side of the discussion is winning when we present such clear and convincing arguments that the other side resorts to attacks on the delivery of the message and is avoiding speaking to the message itself.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )