|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 28 2012 @ 10:28 AM EST |
The commentary on the conference referred to the
"business/legal" and "technical" people. IIRC, the Google
representative came out on the technical side.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 28 2012 @ 06:45 PM EST |
As much as I'm against software patents, I admit I'll completely switch over
and wholeheartedly support them if the software-patent advocates can
convincingly answer one question:
When exactly, for the purposes of
patentability, does this
machine become a different machine?
Follow up
questions:
- Are all Turing Complete computers effectively the same
machine for the purposes of process patents?
- If so, could any Turing
Complete computer have already violated every patent reading on any Turing
Complete computer?
- If so, why doesn't this list include the human
brain? ...Wait, Prometheus said it did.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|