|
Authored by: jesse on Tuesday, November 27 2012 @ 08:38 PM EST |
Although it found the application, nothing would display - every page came up
blank.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Charles888 on Tuesday, November 27 2012 @ 10:53 PM EST |
During his keynote address to the Center for American
Progress while defending the "great" work done by the USPTO
on behalf of the American people, did Director Kappos ever
stop to consider how silly they look to the rest of the
planet (as well as anybody remotely connected to technology
development anywhere)?
I understand this is a "Design" Patent which is a weird
concept to begin with. But being called a patent, most jury
in court has no clue how to evaluate them. The standard
seems to be "as broad as possible". This is specially the
case when a holder mixes his claim with functional patents
as has happened in the Apple-Samsung case.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Ian Al on Wednesday, November 28 2012 @ 05:07 AM EST |
.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|