decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Get what the poll shows right, at least. | 217 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Get what the poll shows right, at least.
Authored by: AntiFUD on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 07:15 AM EST
I disagree, 'cos I think that most, if not all, of the other law blawgs
competing are written by attorneys for other attorneys to read and/or comment
on.

The major differentiating factor here is that Groklaw was designed from the
ground up to provide a venue for an educational exposure to the legal system(s)
and the technology sector for non lawyers by providing case studies and
commentary thereon.

Further, Groklaw provides for feedback from its readers to debunk the FUD that
surrounds the parasites that try to justify their existence by claiming illusory
rights that they believe that they unilaterally own and can control through some
undefined blunt instrument commonly known as 'Intellectual Property'.

Furthermore, Groklaw does not rely on clients, kudos amongst its peers, nor the
outcome of the reported cases for its continued existence. Groklaw is more than
a blawg, it is a community.

With over 20,000 registered members I am surprised that the vote count has only
reached 200, or thereabouts.

I guess I should be grateful to SCOG for repeatedly loading and discharging
their footgun, else how would Groklaw have been conceived?

YMMV

---
IANAL - Free to Fight FUD - "to this very day"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )