decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The question was posed in one of the cases we looked at | 354 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The question was posed in one of the cases we looked at
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 10:49 AM EST
The usual argument is that copyright does not protect a
small company when a big company decides to duplicate
functionality and distribute for free. In cases where first
mover advantage is not decisive, this does result in a
significant disincentive to develop products.

--Erwin

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The question was posed in one of the cases we looked at
Authored by: AntiFUD on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 02:43 PM EST
You have confused me --- how did I miss Oracle suing Novell and who was the
judge, and in which court?

Why hasn't PJ been following this case more closely?

Could it be that you have confused Novell with Google and their Android java
SSO?

---
IANAL - Free to Fight FUD - "to this very day"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )