decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Chinese Patents | 354 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Chinese Patents
Authored by: Tkilgore on Saturday, November 24 2012 @ 06:29 PM EST
What I said, without going into detail.

But you (and also the panelist who mentioned that foreign companies have been
for quite some time filing for a huge number of US patents) did not mention the
other thing that I mentioned, that foreign companies are buying up US companies,
and when a company is bought, its patent portfolio is bought, too.

> The US has been the leading country in pushing for stronger patent laws,
under the impression that the US would own all the patents and the rest of the
world would pay "rent" to the US. It's easy to see that nothing could
be further from the truth. In reality, the Chinese are the ones who will own all
the patents, and before long Americans will be able to do nothing without paying
someone in China for the privilege.

Indeed. And not just for the reason you (and the panelist) mentioned, but for
the reason I mentioned, too.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Chinese Patents - the LeMay solution
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 10:17 PM EST
I don't see the problem. They get too many patents,
all we have to do is bomb them back into the stone
age. Thanks to Curtis LeMay for *that* idea.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )