decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Agreed. Bandaids are the big-business solution so they can continue lawbreaking. ...nt | 354 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Agreed. Bandaids are the big-business solution so they can continue lawbreaking. ...nt
Authored by: mbouckaert on Monday, November 26 2012 @ 03:05 PM EST
IMHO. framing the debate solely in terms of Patents and
Copyright is already a band-aid. These two were imagined
before technology did create the kind of complexity we see
in software, or the type of confusion we see from "similar"
products that do differ in pretty important ways (I am
thinking about physical stuff, and of ripples of things like
the infamous Soviet Inch here.)

Like: It sounds logical that something as intricate and
complex as Java SE should somehow be protected from slavish
imitation; it also sounds obvious that neither Patents nor
Copyrights fit the need.

Like: It sounds proper to protect a "lean" approach to
design, la Apple/Braun; but how (and how much) can one
protect the *absence* of features, using the existing Patent
/ Copyright / Trade dress tools?


And in all cases boundaries need be defined between form,
process, ideas, related ideas, "de minimis" stuff (IANAL, so
a question here: "de minimis" appears not to apply to
patents?!)

I would expect "institutions of higher learning" to wrestle
with all of that and digest before any legislative branch is
involved. Time frame in decades. I am probably looking at
all the wrong places, but is there anything like that
happening anywhere?

---
bck

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )