|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 23 2012 @ 12:30 AM EST |
If MS is involved, MS wins.
If Apple is involved, Apple wins.
And so on explains 99% of FM's calls. He's right whenever one of those
companies wins something and wrong when they don't.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 23 2012 @ 12:52 AM EST |
> It's clearly not random or he'd be right half the time.
Errmm, there's a lot of different random distributions,
I could probably find one to fit his results.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 24 2012 @ 12:36 AM EST |
It's clearly not random or he'd be right half the
time.
Only with a normal distribution and FM is far from
normal...
If you were to toss a fair coin repeatedly (ideally for an
infinite amount of time) you would get any number of repeated heads (or tails)
you wish - only in the long run (ie after an infinite number of tosses) would
the proportion of heads and tails be exactly 50:50. So FM can be entirely
random - using a coin to decide whether to write truth (Heads) or not-truth
(Tails): its just in the middle of a very long sequence of Tails in the infinite
sequence that is eventually 50:50. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|